Mydeposits chief executive hits back at ‘broken system’ Which? report

which-logo-300x192The chief executive of mydeposits has hit back at a new Which? report published this week calling for reform of the deposit system for tenants in the private rented sector.

Eddie Hooker highlighted that since their introduction 12 years ago, Tenancy Deposit Protection schemes have consistently delivered a good service for the majority of tenants.

“I recognise that the systems and processes of deposit protection may need updating to deal with today’s rental market [but] having carried out extensive research I do not believe that overhauling the current system in favour of, for example, no deposit insurance alternatives, offers any greater protection for tenants”

Hooker concedes that there is an affordability issue for tenants in the market, with the average deposit in London now reaching £2500, this is a situation that must be addressed.

However, Hooker believes that some proposed alternatives could have negative consequences for tenants, adding that ultimately tenants are still liable for recompense to an insurance company which many simply do not realise.

“However, purchasing an insurance policy which reimburses a landlord if the tenant cannot or will not pay any losses, simply buys the tenant out of having to pay a deposit and could place tenants is a worse situation some years down the line” he says.

“The fees and/or premiums charged over a 10 year renting period, could end up costing the tenant £6,000 to £7,000 for nothing. What many don’t understand is that deposits are refundable if the tenant abides by the terms of the tenancy agreement. Insurance premiums are not” adds Hooker.

Hooker argues that any proposed change to the current TDP system should recognise the existing benefits, such as Alternative Dispute Resolution, but be enhanced for a modern rental market.

“Options such as deposit loans, custodial only schemes or deposit passporting could address affordability issues and offer tenants greater control, while continuing to give landlords the confidence to remain in the buy to let market.”

Read the full Which? report here

This entry was posted in Blog, deposits, Fees, Regulation, research. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s